I know that most people want to get Palo Alto Networks Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst certification. But due to the difficulty of the actual test and interference of some trifles, people always postpone the study plan for the test preparation. As the old saying goes, everything is hard in the beginning. But once we start the thing, our potential will beyond what you think. If you have a strong desire to change your life and challenge your career and want to be a professional IT person. Now, I think you should begin to prepare for the Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst exam test. Then how to begin will be the questions you should consider.

First, you should start with an honest assessment of your abilities and experience, and make a study plan according to your actual situation. Due to the particularity about actual Palo Alto Networks Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst exam test, the simple reviewing is just not enough, so you should prepare with the help of some valid and useful exam reference. After all, the cost of the actual Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst exam test is too much expensive. To choose a study material is better than you to attend the test twice and spend the expensive cost for double.

So here, we will recommend you a very valid and useful Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst training guide.

Always stand behind our products

We take our customer as god. What we do is to meet customers' need and let them satisfied with our exam dumps and customer service. So, standing behind our products and our customer are a very important thing to us. If you choose our NetSec-Analyst Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst sure pass torrent, you will enjoy one year free update, the latest dumps will be sent to your email as soon as it updated, so you will keep your knowledge the newest all the time, then, you can easily face any changes in the actual test.

In addition, we promise to give you full refund in case of you fail the Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst actual exam. We are credible and honest which deserve your trust. You should show us your failure report, just need to send us the scanning copy, which is easy to operate. If you have any other questions or requirements, please contact us by email or online chat, our 24/7 customer service will be at your side.

Instant Download: Our system will send you the NetSec-Analyst braindumps files you purchase in mailbox in a minute after payment. (If not received within 12 hours, please contact us. Note: don't forget to check your spam.)

High hit rate for your successful pass

We always adhere to the promise to provide you with the best valid and high-quality exam dumps. We have established expert team to research and develop the IT technology. Every day, our experts will check the updated information about the actual exam test, and catch and grasp the latest message, in order to ensure the Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst study guide shown front of you are the best and latest. Besides, the content in the Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst easy pass dumps is very comprehensive and covers all most all the key points in the actually test, which are very easy for you to understand and grasp. Unlike the dumps provided by other vendors, our Palo Alto Networks Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst study guide include not just questions & answers but also together with detail explanations, so when you study, you will understand every questions and know why to choose the answers. Thus you will never face the awkward situation in the actual test that the sequences of the answers are changed in the actual test but you just only remember the answers letter. Practice more and study with the NetSec-Analyst Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst guide dumps by heart, you will pass the actual test successfully with high score.

Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst Sample Questions:

1. An organization relies heavily on cloud-based Software as a Service (SaaS) applications. They need to implement a security policy that allows access to approved SaaS applications (e.g., Office 365, Box) but strictly blocks all other SaaS applications, and also prevents any shadow IT usage. Furthermore, for approved SaaS applications, the organization wants to apply specific content inspection profiles for data loss prevention and malware prevention. Which combination of Security Policy rules and features would be the most robust and maintainable?

A) Rule 1 (Allow): Source: Internal, Destination: Untrust, Application: office365-base, box-base, Service: application-default, Action: allow, Profiles: Data Filtering, Antivirus. Rule 2 (Deny): Source: Internal, Destination: Untrust, Application: any, Service: any, Action: deny.
B) Rule 1 (Allow): Source: Internal, Destination: Untrust, Application Group: 'Approved_SaaS_Applications' (with App-IDs for Office 365, Box etc.), Service: application-default, Action: allow, Profiles: Data Filtering, Antivirus, WildFire, Spyware. Rule 2 (Deny): Source: Internal, Destination: Untrust, Application Group: 'Unknown_SaaS_Applications' (using App-ID filters), Service: application-default, Action: deny. Rule 3 (Final Deny): Source: Internal, Destination: Untrust, Application: any, Service: any, Action: deny.
C) Rule 1 (Allow): Source: Internal, Destination: Untrust, Application Filter: 'Approved_SaaS_Apps' (custom filter group), Service: application-default, Action: allow, Profiles: Data Filtering, Antivirus, Vulnerability Protection, URL Filtering (block unknown/unrated). Rule 2 (Deny): Source: Internal, Destination: Untrust, Application: any, Service: application-default, Action: deny.
D) Rule 1 (Allow): Source: Internal, Destination: Untrust, Application: office365-base, box-base, Service: tcp/443, Action: allow, Profiles: URL Filtering (allow approved SaaS URLs). Rule 2 (Deny): Source: Internal, Destination: Untrust, Application: any, Service: tcp/443, Action: deny.
E) Rule 1 (Allow): Source: Internal, Destination: Untrust, Application Filter: 'SaaS', Action: allow, Profiles: Data Filtering, Antivirus. Rule 2 (Deny): Source: Internal, Destination: Untrust, Application: any, Action: deny.

2. An IoT smart building system uses BACnet/IP for HVAC control. The security team discovers a device sending unauthorized 'Write Property' requests to BACnet objects that control critical ventilation fans, potentially disrupting air quality. They have identified the rogue device's MAC address and IP address, but its type (vendor/model) is not yet fully classified by Device-ID. How can the Palo Alto Networks NGFW be configured, leveraging IoT security concepts, to immediately block these specific 'Write Property' requests from this rogue device, while allowing legitimate BACnet traffic from authorized devices?

A) Leverage a combination of 'IoT Device Group' for authorized BACnet devices, and an explicit 'Deny' rule that uses 'Application Function Filtering' for BACnet/Lp to block 'Write Property' requests, with 'Source: Any' and 'Destination: HVAC PLCs', placed higher than the allow rule.
B) Configure an 'IP-MAC Binding' entry for the rogue device, then create a 'Threat Prevention' custom signature to detect the 'Write Property' request payload and block it.
C) Create a new 'IoT Security Profile' specifically for the rogue device's IP address, enable 'Application Function Filtering' for BACnet/IP to block 'Write Property', and create a 'Security Policy' rule matching only this rogue device to apply this profile.
D) Within an existing 'IoT Security Profile' applied to BACnet traffic, configure 'Application Function Filtering' for BACnet/IP to block 'Write Property' function codes. Apply this profile to all relevant IoT policy rules.
E) Create a new 'Security Policy' rule with the rogue device's IP address as 'Source', the HVAC PLC's IP as 'Destination', 'Application: bacnet-ip', and a 'Service' of 'any', with an 'Action: Deny'. Place this rule highest in the rulebase.

3. Consider a scenario where a Palo Alto Networks firewall is configured with a Log Forwarding Profile named 'LFP Compliance SIEM'. This profile is attached to a Security Policy that permits outbound web access for internal users. The profile includes two syslog server destinations: 'Syslog_Archiver' (UDP, default format) and 'Syslog_SlEM' (TCP, CEF format). Due to a network change, the IP address of 'Syslog_SlEM' needs to be updated. Which of the following commands, executed in PAN-OS CLI operational mode, would allow verification of the currently configured Log Forwarding Profile details, specifically to confirm the change after it's applied?

A)

B)

C)

D)

E)

4. During a breach investigation, a Network Security Analyst needs to retroactively search for specific malicious file hashes (MD5) that might have been downloaded or uploaded through the firewall within the last 30 days. These hashes were not known at the time of the initial traffic. The Incidents and Alerts page currently shows no alerts related to these hashes. Which of the following approaches is the MOST efficient and effective to perform this retrospective analysis using Palo Alto Networks tools, including Log Viewer and potentially other integrated services?

A) Leverage Cortex Data Lake (CDL) via the Log Viewer interface. Construct a highly specific query that targets 'threat' logs of 'file' type, including a filter for 'file- digest in ()'. This will provide historical matches efficiently.
B) Go to the 'Monitor > Logs > URL Filtering' page and filter by destination URL to see if any known malicious domains associated with the hashes were accessed.
C) Use the 'Threat Log' filter in the Log Viewer, specifically looking for 'file' type threats. Then, manually inspect the 'File Digest' column for each log entry and compare it against the known malicious hashes.
D) Upload the malicious hashes to the WildFire analysis cloud and request a re-scan of historical files. WildFire will then automatically generate alerts on the Incidents and Alerts page if matches are found.
E) Export all 'data' logs from the Log Viewer for the last 30 days and use a custom script to parse them for the MD5 hashes. This is the only way as the firewall does not store hashes.

5. Consider a scenario where a Palo Alto Networks firewall is used to secure access to a critical internal web application that uses a custom header for authentication, e.g., 'X-Auth-Token: [TOKEN VALUE]'. To enhance security, the organization wants to implement a custom vulnerability signature that detects attempts to bypass this authentication by submitting requests with a missing or malformed 'X-Auth- Token' header. Which of the following PCRE (Perl Compatible Regular Expressions) patterns for a custom vulnerability signature would effectively detect both a completely missing 'X-Auth-Token' header and an 'X-Auth-Token' header that is present but followed by an empty string or only whitespace, specifically when targeting HTTP POST requests to '/api/vl/secure_resource'? Assume the signature 'Location' is 'http-post-request-headers' and 'Scope' is 'transaction'.

A)

B)

C)

D)

E)

Solutions: